MSSN 880 Micro-teaching Peer Evaluation
Evaluation
Teacher
*
Evaluator
*
Topic
Subject
1 = Poor, 5 = Outstanding
1. Was the teaching informative?
1
2
3
4
5
2. Did the teaching have a clear focus?
1
2
3
4
5
3. Was the teaching well researched?
1
2
3
4
5
4. Did the teaching demonstrate the validity of the topic?
1
2
3
4
5
Organization/Clarity
1 = Poor, 5 = Outstanding
1. Was the teaching easy to follow?
1
2
3
4
5
2. Was the introduction engaging?
1
2
3
4
5
3. Did the teacher conclude within the time allotted?
1
2
3
4
5
4. Did the conclusion reinforce the teaching?
1
2
3
4
5
Preparation
1 = Poor, 5 = Outstanding
1. Was the teacher well prepared?
1
2
3
4
5
2. Was the teacher in control of the sequence, pacing, and flow of the teaching?
1
2
3
4
5
3. Did the teacher demonstrate the topic’s relevancy to the learners?
1
2
3
4
5
4. Was the teacher able to answer questions effectively?
1
2
3
4
5
Sensitivity to audience
1 = Poor, 5 = Outstanding
1. Did the teacher emphasize the main ideas?
1
2
3
4
5
2. Did the teacher show respect for the learners?
1
2
3
4
5
3. Did the teacher engage the learners in their own learning?
1
2
3
4
5
4. Did the teacher show enthusiasm for the topic?
1
2
3
4
5
Teaching methodology
1 = Poor, 5 = Outstanding
1. Did the teacher effectively use different teaching methodologies?
1
2
3
4
5
2. Were the teaching methodologies appropriate for the topic?
1
2
3
4
5
3. Were the various teaching methodologies given appropriate time?
1
2
3
4
5
4. Did the teaching methodologies help you learn?
1
2
3
4
5
Δ