MSSN 880 Micro-teaching Peer Evaluation

Teacher*
Evaluator*
Topic
Subject
1 = Poor, 5 = Outstanding
1. Was the teaching informative?
1 2 3 4 5
2. Did the teaching have a clear focus?
1 2 3 4 5
3. Was the teaching well researched?
1 2 3 4 5
4. Did the teaching demonstrate the validity of the topic?
1 2 3 4 5
Organization/Clarity
1 = Poor, 5 = Outstanding
1. Was the teaching easy to follow?
1 2 3 4 5
2. Was the introduction engaging?
1 2 3 4 5
3. Did the teacher conclude within the time allotted?
1 2 3 4 5
4. Did the conclusion reinforce the teaching?
1 2 3 4 5
Preparation
1 = Poor, 5 = Outstanding
1. Was the teacher well prepared?
1 2 3 4 5
2. Was the teacher in control of the sequence, pacing, and flow of the teaching?
1 2 3 4 5
3. Did the teacher demonstrate the topic’s relevancy to the learners?
1 2 3 4 5
4. Was the teacher able to answer questions effectively?
1 2 3 4 5
Sensitivity to audience
1 = Poor, 5 = Outstanding
1. Did the teacher emphasize the main ideas?
1 2 3 4 5
2. Did the teacher show respect for the learners?
1 2 3 4 5
3. Did the teacher engage the learners in their own learning?
1 2 3 4 5
4. Did the teacher show enthusiasm for the topic?
1 2 3 4 5
Teaching methodology
1 = Poor, 5 = Outstanding
1. Did the teacher effectively use different teaching methodologies?
1 2 3 4 5
2. Were the teaching methodologies appropriate for the topic?
1 2 3 4 5
3. Were the various teaching methodologies given appropriate time?
1 2 3 4 5
4. Did the teaching methodologies help you learn?
1 2 3 4 5

Subject